Reimbursement Considerations: Corneal Hysteresis Testing with the Ocular Response Analyzer (ORA)

Reimbursement Considerations:  Corneal Hysteresis Testing with the Ocular Response Analyzer (ORA)
Kevin J. Corcoran, COE, CPC, FNAO and,
Ryan D. Alfonso, MPH
Managing Editor

Measuring the biomechanical properties of the cornea with Reichert’s Ocular Response Analyzer™ (ORA) enables practitioners and researchers to quantify various corneal conditions. Corneal hysteresis testing with the ORA is useful in identifying abnormal corneal conditions, evaluating IOP measurements and assessing the potential for complications following corneal refractive surgery. Low corneal hysteresis (CH) demonstrates that the cornea is less capable of absorbing (damping) the energy of the air pulse. Clinical studies suggest that a low CH measurement may indicate ocular abnormalities or corneas at risk for disease.

Hysteresis is defined as the lagging of an effect behind its cause, as when some neurons do not return to their basal conditions from a stimulated condition immediately after removal of the stimulus. Hysteresis is a property of systems that do not instantly respond to forces applied to them, but react slowly, or do not return completely to their original state: that is, systems whose states depend on their immediate history.


Figure 1. Corneal hysteresis is the difference between the inward and outward applanation pressures.

One of the foremost experts on the clinical utility of the ORA is Mitsugu Shimmyo, M.D. (New York, NY). Dr. Shimmyo has been using the ORA in clinical studies, and in practice, since the first prototype units were implemented in 2003. He has presented his findings at the American Academy of Ophthalmology, the World Ophthalmology Congress, and numerous other meetings world-wide.

“There are no other methods that provide the information ORA does. This is the only instrument to measure IOP corrected for corneal effects (viscoelasticity of the cornea) clinically.”
- Mitsugu Shimmyo, M.D.

The ORA has been shown to be of great benefit in detecting low or normal tension glaucoma, to resolve the diagnosis of glaucoma where it is suspected, and in the management of ocular hypertension patients. In addition, other research shows that incorporating the ORA in preop work-up of refractive surgery patients may reduce the risk of post-LASIK ectasia by allowing you to detect those at increased risk. Dr. Shimmyo also sees value in measuring CH following corneal refractive surgeries, and in the evaluation and monitoring of keratoconus patients. It is important to mention that the ORA measurement is noncontact and very rapid. The entire measurement process takes only seconds.

Adapting a new instrument and technology in your practice can sometimes be confusing. Here are a few key considerations one needs to be mindful of with regard to reimbursement for ORA procedures.

In addition to the printout following completion of CH testing with the ORA, the chart should contain:

  • an order for the test with medical rationale
  • the date of the test
  • the reliability of the test
  • the test findings
  • a diagnosis (if possible)
  • the impact on treatment and prognosis
  • the signature of the physician

A form suitable for documenting the interpretation of CH testing is available on the Corcoran Consulting Group website.

Category III CPT code 0181T should be used to report CH testing.

  • 0181T Corneal hysteresis determination, by air impulse stimulation, bilateral, with interpretation and report.

This new technology code was effective July 1, 2007 and appears in the 2008 edition of CPT. Medicare does not bundle CH testing with other diagnostic tests performed on the same day nor does it assign relative value units or a dollar value to Category III CPT codes. Reimbursement is determined on a case-by-case basis at the discretion of the payer.


Figure 2. Reichert's Ocular Response Analyzer™

“With the volume of patients I have, the ORA paid for itself in two months. In my experience, Healthfirst, 1199, Cigna, and Aetna have offered reimbursement. Some companies request a reason to perform the test based on the information the test provides. Some simply ask for a justification based on the patient’s diagnosis. Answer all their questions, and you’ll find that many companies will pay.”
- Mitsugu Shimmyo, M.D.

Since reimbursement is uncertain, and Medicare has no preauthorization mechanism, ophthalmologists and optometrists should consider asking the patient to be financially responsible for CH testing. Prior to administering the test, obtain the patient’s signature on an Advance Beneficiary Notice of Noncoverage (ABN) for Medicare patients or on another suitable waiver form for other third party payers.

How frequently a test may be performed and filed for reimbursement is a common concern expressed by physicians. There are no published limitations for repeated CH testing. In general, this and all diagnostic tests are reimbursed “when medically indicated” for new symptoms, disease progression, new findings, unreliable prior results, or a change in the treatment plan. In general, additional testing is warranted when the information garnered from the eye exam is insufficient to adequately assess the patient’s disease. Clear documentation of the reason for testing is always required.

Evaluating the biomechanical properties of the cornea with the ORA is an application of advanced technology in ophthalmology. It represents a new diagnostic tool which can assist ophthalmologists and optometrists to better understand the mechanism of corneal disease as well as other ocular abnormalities.

  • <<
  • >>

Comments